this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
979 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59593 readers
2967 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The US Department of Justice and 16 state and district attorneys general accused Apple of operating an illegal monopoly in the smartphone market in a new antitrust lawsuit. The DOJ and states are accusing Apple of driving up prices for consumers and developers at the expense of making users more reliant on its iPhones.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 138 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Be prepared for a lot of hand-wringing about "security".

Apple, Microsoft, and Google all learned in the last couple years "security" shuts down any arguments, and they use it at every turn to justify whatever they want, regardless of the actual dangers or alternative mitigation methods they could take.

If our modern software security means anti-competitive behavior and user lock-in tactics are OK, then that's a problem with our security practices, and we need to reevaluate some things.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 74 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If they utter "security for children" the government will probably not only drop the lawsuit but pay Apple $20 billion.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago (1 children)

they could get an extra 50 billion if they say “security for children, against terrorists”

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Make it $100 billion if the terrorist children have brown faces.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

And deduct all billions if we're talking about domestic terrorism, or if there's any mention of insurrection.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Market security maybe What's next im not allowed to read the EULA because i may come up with nefarious ways to still use the service?

[–] T156@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

If you can read the EULA, then you can learn how to skirt around it, and therefore, letting you read the EULA is against the spirit of the EULA, and should be banned.

[–] turkishdelight@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They learned this line from the government. You can't criticise goverments after they utter the magical national security buzzwords.