this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
56 points (100.0% liked)
Science
13015 readers
36 users here now
Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
My first thought was "WTF", but then I considered the problem. You can grow beef cells, but only easily in a thin layer. So, get something porous but edible, and grow the cells all over it. Rice is just an obvious choice from a culinary perspective.
It's weird, but I bet cooked up as a burrito or casserole this could actually be appealing, and it'll be way easier to commercialise than more traditional meat shapes.
Edit: So, here's Nature on the same. As usual, popsci left out the gotcha, and that's that there's not actually a significant amount of beef there. Rice is only slightly porous, just as it seems, I guess.
Once you can eat a hotdog, you can eat anything. Chicken nuggets and surimi are an even worse "meat shape", yet plenty of people eat them.
Oh god, did I just coin that? Why did it have to be that?
What meat shapes are your favourites? mine is the token shape as it is easily applicable to bread products.
I'm a vegetarian, lol!
What is your favourite plant then? i like munching on lettuce as a snack, but kiwis are a close second
Definitely some kind of fruit, I love that shit. It's hard to pick a favourite, but maybe pineapple?
I like pineapple because when you eat it, it eats you; the bromelin starts "digesting" your mouth as soon as you dig in.
So fun. Also nothing else is more delicious than fresh sliced pineapple.
So you're saying my favourite fruit is, itself, not vegetarian?
The confusing thing about that is that pineapple actually is a fruit, botanically. It would make so much more sense if it was a succulant, being pointy, large and chemically hostile, and growing on a plant adapted for low-water CAM photosynthesis.
I never thought of it that way but your reasoning is not unsound. Hahahaha.
Brassica oleracea
https://www.sciencealert.com/images/2017-06/same-plant.jpg