this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
3052 points (98.1% liked)

lemmy.ml meta

1406 readers
1 users here now

Anything about the lemmy.ml instance and its moderation.

For discussion about the Lemmy software project, go to !lemmy@lemmy.ml.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It should come as no surprise that the lemmy.ml admin team took about 2 minutes to decide to pre-emptively block threats / Meta. Their transparent and opportunistic scheme to commodify the fediverse and it's users will not be allowed to proceed.

We strongly encourage other instance administrators to do the same, given the grave threat they pose to the fediverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] o1o12o21@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Excellent move. Hope bluesky is next.

[–] ArghZombies@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Bluesky is a different protocol.

Yep, Bluesky uses the Authorized Transfer Protocol, so for now, we are safe in not having to block them.

[–] o1o12o21@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ooh, did not know that, thanks for catching that. Anyway, they shouldn't be let in as well in case they can bridge between protocols some day.

[–] Pika@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm going out on a limb and saying that you probably saw the assertive/work phrases post and that's why you phrased that that way. I could be completely wrong but that ideology made me chuckle.

[–] ArghZombies@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What, Bluesky shouldn't be let into the fediverse, or Bluesky shouldn't let Threads in?

I don't see any problem with Bluesky. They've got a decent philosophy and approach, tbh.

[–] o1o12o21@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No Bluesky in Lemmy I meant. They should and probably be easily let into mastodon. They are not evil definitely, I did not intend to say that. Just that they are doing too much, it feels, feature wise. I may be wrong.

load more comments (3 replies)