Technology

59572 readers

3463 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

697

Own a Roku TV or streaming device? You're about to see a lot more ads on your home screen (www.techradar.com)

submitted 10 months ago by AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

273 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Ugh. Roku was one of the platforms with fewer ads.

Roku will be adding more ads to the home screens of its devices and TVs in the near future.
The ads will be interactive and 'shoppable' and will cover a range of industries, including restaurants and cars.
Roku already has a significant amount of ads on its home screen, and it is unclear if users will be able to change their preferences for the new ads.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Rumor has it Roku hard coded Google DNS nameservers on some devices so along with pihole, you have to block direct access now. FYI

I had a pihole that worked until an update. Had to block Google nameservers to restore blocking.

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I expect you can seal this off with pfblockerng.

The big issue is that they might start putting a checkpoint in place wherein the application (roku device) will not proceed unless it gets an expected response token from a call to an ad service. At that point we're at their mercy.

They could even run under their own VPN and hook up the ads on their side... Ugh...

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They could even run under their own VPN and hook up the ads on their side... Ugh...

I've always wondered why Google doesn't provide that to its ad clients. Companies send their traffic to Google, Google puts the ads in, mixes it all up in one pot, sends it to the user in a way DNS filtering can't block without also blocking the content.

[–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works -2 points 10 months ago

At that point we're at their mercy.

Or maybe at that point you'll begin to realize that you might not need all of this stuff, and that happyness comes from other sources. But that is just my personal approach, by all means do whatever you like.

[–] stinerman@midwest.social 1 points 10 months ago

Interesting. So far so good for me.