this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
587 points (100.0% liked)

196

16453 readers
1710 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 13 points 10 months ago (11 children)

Could I get the opinion of a MTG player? Would you put this card into your deck?

[–] MonsieurTaser@feddit.de 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, probably not. We just got the same card in the latest set, but without being legendary and in green. And while its not bad, it is also not very good. Wouldnt see play in older formats (except in combo decks like Amalia+Wildgrowth Walker) and is currently not seeing much play in Standard.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah, the problem with explore is that it's ramp that sometimes doesn't ramp, and pump that sometimes doesn't pump. If you play this really needing another land you'll probably end up with a 2/2, and if you play it really wanting a 2/2 you'll probably end up mana flooded.

Like, neither of those are bad things, but getting what you need beats getting something good every time. As little bonus extra that sometimes makes your mana more consistent and sometimes beefs up a boi, it's not bad, but as the only extra on a 1 mana 1/1 it's very unexciting.

What I'm trying to figure out though is if "Explores twice" would be too powerful for a legendary creature? Maybe if it was a 0/1?

Edit: Also, is it just me, or does it really feel like Tom Scott, of all people, should have a leaves the battlefield effect? Like, this is a card that should do something cool when it exits, right?

load more comments (9 replies)