this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
217 points (99.5% liked)
Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
2317 readers
383 users here now
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not anymore, at least with fire. Fire departments used to essentially sell insurance and would let your house burn if you hadn't paid.
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna39516346
What the fuck.
This was the libertarian utopia they wanted I would bet.
Right up until it affects them.
This one has been bouncing around in my mind since I read about it a few hours back.
Imagine picking up the phone to a fire call and saying "nah, sorry, your house has to burn" and thinking that's OK over seventy five fucking dollars.
I'm really having trouble wrapping my head around it.
It’s kinda the way taxes and insurance works. It wasn’t $75 - if you divide the annual costs of a fire station by the fires put out it’s probably $100-500k/fire. Or $75 from everyone whether they have a fire or not.
Which is also why the fire department kinda has to let it burn - because no one would actually be ok getting a $100k bill to put out their fire.
Can you imagine not paying the $75 for fire coverage? Surely the county could have just added it as a tax…… and actually provided fire coverage.
But this guy wouldn’t have voted for it almost certainly….