this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
2215 points (98.4% liked)

Memes

45727 readers
855 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 177 points 11 months ago (8 children)

I don't need a 27-page novel to know the temperature and time to cook something. I also don't want to he directed to Pintrest and be required to have an account. Honestly, I've started using Bing more often.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 128 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah honestly. The Google ad-based search system created a set of incentives that just destroyed the internet! I miss the days when people created their own fun little quirky websites like Ian's Shoelace Site. That used to be every site on the internet!

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

But do you remember Geocities?

[–] jennwiththesea@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Every 3-5 years, I go and check on my Angelfire. It's still there today.

https://ibb.co/WPH835P

[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago

Your old site isn’t just fire, it’s angelfire!

[–] jennwiththesea@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Lucky! Mine's gone, and I honestly can't remember if I deleted it

[–] vrek@programming.dev 5 points 11 months ago

Am I old if I remember xoom?

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I don’t need a 27-page novel to know the temperature and time to cook something.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/recipe-filter/

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I would like a Firefox add-on that filters out sites where recipe ingredients are measured in cups and the recipes contain butter and sugar when they shouldn't, thanks very much

Adding "UK" used to work, but doesn't anymore

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

the recipes contain butter when they shouldn't

But noodles aren't that difficult to make

[–] doingless@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I also don't want to need an add-on for every niche thing I like to look at.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

The Google habit is hit the third link, scroll to fourth paragraph, your answer should be around there somewhere.

[–] Daryl76679@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Try Brave Search, Duckduckgo, Startpage, or Searxng. For more detail on these recommendation (that I definitely did not just steal), check out the Privacy Guides page, or The New Oil for a different, albeit overlapping, set of recommendations and take on search engines.

[–] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 36 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Best not to use brave since it's a front for crypto. Other's are okay

[–] kattenluik@feddit.nl 20 points 11 months ago

DuckDuckGo has recently become a not very useful search engine too, it still has way way better queries than Google though.

Going back usually shuffles the search results and after like 5 results there's just a bunch of random entries based on your geolocation.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 0 points 11 months ago

I disagree! It's best to not use Brave since it's a front for a homophobe.

[–] gogosempai@programming.dev 0 points 11 months ago

Avoid the browser but I've been using their search on Firefox. Really like the AI summarizer and the results are also good.

[–] snowe@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago

You mention brave but no mention of kagi? Kagi is way better than DDG too.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Did the Privacy Guides drama ever get resolved re: PrivacyTools. I recall one was split off from the other over draaaamaaa.

[–] Daryl76679@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

I mean I guess. They aren't actively fighting or anything like that to my knowledge. I personally think the Privacy Guides is the better resource, because PrivacyTools has vpn recommendations like Nord and Surfshark with affiliate links that are not actively disclosed from my quick check.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

No joke, Bing Chat is considerably better at finding answers than any search engine I've used in recent years. I don't even bother googling things anymore. Just ask the AI.

[–] Fixbeat@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I just ask ChatGPT these days.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I'm just starting to learn HTML and oh my fucking god do I LOVE chatGPT... Holy hell... I can't even begin to express just how amazing it is to be able to ask basic questions and not only get a reply, but provide example code, and it will elaborate or be as concise as you like... I LOVE IT! I'm especially happy to see they don't ask for your phone number and other absurdly intrusive unnecessary information anymore. That's what kept me away at first.

I do know it's not infallible and I probably won't use it as much as I move on to more complex programming.

[–] frokie@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I do fairly complex programming and still use chat gpt. It will contribute to be helpful to say “write me a function that does this” rather than “how do I code this”

[–] fluckx@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah it is kind of like the "trust, but verify" paradigm. It will likely generate useful code or a very good starting point, but you should always check if it actually does what you expect it to.

You can't trust them blindly. But They're very helpful in your day to day tasks.

[–] Angry_Maple@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No kidding. Just earlier today, I was looking for a kind of niche tool used to wrap pallets in plastic, and I found nothing on google about it. It kept showing me everything BUT what I was looking for.

On bing, I found just about all of the information I needed about it. Turns out it's niche partially because it's made in my province, which I also found out from bing. Almost no one knows what I'm referring to when I mention it. It combines the technology of machine wrapping and hand wrapping, and it makes warehousing much easier sometimes. I wanted to recommend it to someone. Thanks Bing!

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

Is it much different from a pallet wrapper? A big platform you can set a pallet on loaded with stuff and it spins? And you hold what's like a yard wide rolling pin with plastic wrap on it to wrap the pallet as it spins?