this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
1419 points (99.1% liked)

Memes

45727 readers
960 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Universities lose money on sports in net because of title IX. Football/basketball subsidize every other athletic program at a university.

Also reports generally don't include donations as sports revenue, but a significant chunk are absolutely related to the athletic program.

[–] g0d0fm15ch13f@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Title 9 is the definition of great idea but terrible execution. It has caused tons of men's non revenue programs to fold in the past few decades. Notably, as a swimmer, the University of Iowa no longer has a men's swim team, and they literally invented butterfly.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

There's really not a good solution. Non-revenue sports are always going to be facing cuts. If you limited to having similar sport offerings, then it's probably only basketball, baseball/softball, and football/something that are offered, and even baseball is limited to a handful of universities.

If you limit scholarships like the current system, because football has so many scholarships, there needs to be 4-5 women's sports to be balanced. If you add some rules to force offering a men's team for each women's team, then it's a huge benefit for the men even if there aren't scholarships available.