Technology

59572 readers

3572 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1274

Google admits it's making YouTube worse for ad block users (www.theregister.com)

submitted 11 months ago by TangledHyphae@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

321 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mawkishdave@lemmy.world 62 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And freetube is making it so much better.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Something I didn't even realize I wanted was to not have some eyeball-pulling algorithm recommending things to me. It's lovely.

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yep. Personally use Piped, but it's the same idea. It basically saves me hours of watching useless videos everyday.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Now if only Piped wouldn't error out and be unusable for 10 minutes at a time every couple hours...

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't for me, though.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I have been trying to figure out why since I started using it... searches spin forever, videos spin forever, some videos just spit "Error 1003" immediately, and then they become accessible 10 minutes later. I even tried filing an issue to no avail. I may end up looking for other alternatives.

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Have you tried changing the instances? Some instances simply perform better than others.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

I have, but the ones I tried weren't much better. I looked again and there's a few new ones, so I'll try those and update if they work faster/more consistently.

[–] Salix@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's why I've been using YouTube without logging in and if using in browser, I have the cookies autodelete after I close the page to start new each time.

It never really recommended me what I wanted anyway. I guess the algorithm doesn't work on me.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What freetube?

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Google it and join us in video paradise

[–] SlikPikker@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What about sponsor block?

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Freetube has Sponsorblock built-in.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Most of the channels I watch with inline sponsor roll from the creator, they do a good job, and I am entertained by it.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

Obtrusive ads are frustrating.

Perfectly integrated, entertaining, on-brand ads from creators I appreciate? No problem.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

You have the option to disable sponsorblock in freetube.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't care. I was giving you the opportunity to inform others about something you think is cool. You blew it.