this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
1368 points (98.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
798 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago (10 children)

    Locking things behind terminal is not.

    [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    It's not locking behind terminal. It's just not implementing gui. Which is completely valid since that takes time and effort

    [–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Also, writing a GUI wrapper for a terminal-only program is much easier than writing a terminal wrapper for a GUI-only program.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (7 replies)