this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
142 points (97.3% liked)

Furry Technologists

1315 readers
3 users here now

Science, Technology, and pawbs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Those totally look like the isolinear chips from Star Trek

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago (3 children)

So am I wrong to say this is a stone tablet hard drive? Doesn't seem like you can overwrite data on it

[–] HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, looks like write once. Which, we got a lot of mileage out of CD-Rs, libraries are useful.

[–] Chobbes@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I feel like we don’t appreciate the history of data storage enough! It’s kind of wild looking at how different the world was when CD-Rs came out. They could store substantially more data than a typical hard drive of the time and were dirt cheap. So you would get bulletin boards hosting content from optical drives and stuff. It’s also (partially) why you would have to use discs for games in the past, instead of just installing them to the hard drive. When hard drives are expensive it’s probably better to just stream music and assets from an optical disc instead of taking up precious space. Sometimes you could play a game (or part of it) without the disc, but you wouldn’t get music because that was left on the disc.

[–] Froyn@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sometimes you could even put the game in the CD player and listen to the game tracks!

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh man, I forgot you could do that. CDs really are cool

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They’re still the idea music storage format

[–] Froyn@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I know a few vinyl people looking to fight you. lol

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

They’d be objectively wrong while arguing their subjective opinion

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago

I would even argue most storage is used as write once storage. From backup systems to libraries, a lot of data is data we want to just record, and never overwrite.

[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You don't need to. These are intended for backups and data archiving where storage density matters the most

[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Seems like thered be some extra hoops to get through for differential backups, impossible to us for most daily applications, probably better suited for things like laboratory and archives..

[–] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

It looks like you can’t overwrite new data, but you can still punch it full of ones :p