this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
19 points (88.0% liked)

Programming

17383 readers
435 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Which one is better in the context of job opportunities?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Jobs? Probably Go.

But really what's most important is learning portable skills, which amounts to learning about different approaches. In that case, I'd say learn both.

There are a lot of interesting ideas in both languages.

(I learned a lot of great ideas from Go, especially about concurrency. I think it's great for writing the kind of frameworks where that matters. But in terms of "normal" business logic programming, I think it's trash. It not ergonomic at all.)

[–] khoi@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

What lang would be ergonomic you’d say?

[–] FunctionalOpossum@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What's your background? I've mainly used language with huge standard libraries and Go's intentionally small standard library feels very unergonomic sometimes (I miss sets).

Elixir feels very ergonomic to me, but a lot of programmers struggle with the lack of typing.

[–] khoi@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I came from JavaScript NodeJS and Python.

I’ve learnt Elixir and it seems like it’s packed with lots of features/patterns.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)