this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
101 points (92.4% liked)
Programming
17398 readers
104 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Zig
Choosing a high-level language would limit your world so all of those are out. I could make my own high-level language if absolutely necessary from Zig but the reverse is not possible.
Zig > C as it's easier to write safer more secure code while being as fast or even faster than C, and usable in embedded and other places only C is normally used. In fact, I can create C binaries with my Zig compiler.
Zig > Rust because actually writing safe Rust code would use all my time and sanity so would end up writing unsafe Rust, but then what's the point.
Zig > Go because Go is slower, higher level, and backed by one of the most evil entities to ever exist.
Start thinking more functional, I rarely have issues with the borrow-checker, or even have to write
unsafe. But it obviously depends on the context, when the issue at hand really requires a lot of interior mutability orunsafecan be pain.I'm also super fast nowadays with Rust, probably faster than with any other language (thanks to great tooling?).
Sounds like good advice, thx.