this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2021
0 points (50.0% liked)

Fediverse

17717 readers
3 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
0
Dear, Lemmy... (lemmy.ml)
submitted 3 years ago by sinewyshadow@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hi, Lemmy! So I made two mistakes. But I'd like to inform Lemmy, that there is a free speech version of the Lemmy code being used to throw racial slurs around. That instance is called goatpen.co I advise you not to go there, as you will come across racial slurs on the front page.

So my first mistake was asking what people on discussions.app like to use for different social networks. One instance, as mentioned above was goatpen.co. My curiousity got the better of me, and I went to check it out. That was my second mistake. That place is a cesspool.

That's all I wanted to say. Someone or some company is using lemmy's code to host a lemmy-clone and make it a cesspool.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nutomic@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (8 children)

Lemmy is open source, meaning that anyone can use it for whatever purpose they like. Realistically there is nothing we can do against that. The sooner we accept this reality, the better.

In my opinion, the main goal of Lemmy as a project is to challenge proprietary social media like Reddit. That wont be achievable if we try to exclude anyone from using Lemmy. Of course that doesnt mean that we have to agree with their opinions, and block tools exist exactly for this reason.

Also, I think if these extremists leave Reddit, that could eventually lead to their deradicalization. Reddit has no real incentive to deradicalize them, because more users and more activity means more ad money for them. But fediverse instances are usually run by volunteers in their free time, who have less incentive to permit such toxicity.

[–] jhghjbgdrfzhb@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (7 children)

Realistically there is nothing we can do against that

except there are things you could do, if you were using an ethical open source license you'd be able to shut down goatpen.co without trouble

[–] handvat@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Just like a kitchen knife can be used by murderers does not mean that the kitchen knife manufacturer should actively monitor who is buying their knifes and go after the ones with bad intentions in my opinion. In the same way, I don't think free software should be licensed under such an ethical open source license.

First of all, it's just very hard to enforce I'd imagine. Would people who do not care about respecting human rights to begin with even care about such a license? You're not stopping "evil" by making up rules that "evil" people don't follow almost by definition. At least the license is more clear about what is considered as acceptable and what not unlike the infamous "The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil" clause, for which I have to give it some credit.

Everything you can make can be used for wrong things and I suppose you'll have to accept that you'll never have full control over that. The only thing that can stop something to be used by people with bad intentions is to never create it in the first place.

Besides, I´d rather have my enemy use open source software instead of closed source software. If they use open source software, it's easier to get a grasp on what they're capable of.

For software like Lemmy with federation, I'd just say to block those from federating to your own instances and stop giving those instances attention. As long as the flagship instances that federate with each other keep up a positive attitude, I would just ignore those extremist people's instances

[–] jhghjbgdrfzhb@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

Just like a kitchen knife can be used by murderers does not mean that the kitchen knife manufacturer should actively monitor who is buying their knifes and go after the ones with bad intentions in my opinion

wrong

I’d just say to block those from federating to your own instances and stop giving those instances attention

that humanizes them, they'll feel like "i'm not allowed there but at least i can exist", which is a very dangerous precedent

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Could you elaborate with a reason or so for why they are wrong?

[–] jhghjbgdrfzhb@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago

i do not engage in bad-faith discussion

[–] Thann@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Can you explain how we could practically ban kitchen knives from being bought by murders? Also, have you seen minority report?

[–] jhghjbgdrfzhb@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 children)

Can you explain how we could practically ban kitchen knives from being bought by murders?

other, more progressive, countries have done it: https://www.gov.uk/buying-carrying-knives

Also, have you seen minority report?

i support minorities so i would never report them

[–] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 years ago

I died of laughter here. Thanks.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)