988
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by hypertown@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I know I'm bad at math but I don't understand how 2x0=0 but 2^0=1

How are they different answers when they're both essentially multiplying 2 by zero?

Someone with a bigger brain please explain this

Edit: I greatly appreciate all the explanations but all they've done is solidify the fact that I'll never be good at math 😭

[-] jendrik@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 11 months ago

subtracting one from Exponent means halving (when the base is two):

2⁴ = 16 2³ = 8 2² = 4 2¹ = 2 2⁰ = 1

It's a simple continuation of the pattern and required for mathemarical rules to work.

[-] uberrice@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This is confidently wrong.

3^0 is also 1. 2738394728^0 is also 1.

Edit: just saw that technically you're correct - sure.

IF base 2, Exponent reduction equals to halving - dividing by 2.

For x^y reducing y by one is equal to dividing by x, then we have the proof it always works.

[-] Globulart@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

But that's because for 3 the sequence is dividing by 3 not 2.

81, 27, 9, 3, 1, 1/3, 1/9, etc.

3^4, 3^3, 3^2, 3^1, 3^0, 3^(-1), 3^(-2), etc.

You're not always halving, but the method is the same and it sometimes helps people understand the concept more easily.

load more comments (23 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
988 points (96.4% liked)

Memes

45183 readers
3021 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS