this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
21 points (61.1% liked)
Fediverse
28480 readers
717 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, I know of lemmit but AFAIK it has the opposite ideas in many cases:
I wonder if the dev from lemmit would be interested in being the host of some of the "fediversed" communities, so that we can have comments as well.
You have it follow whatever instance you want it to follow. There’s a request community that you post to and it’s then added to the queue.
I don’t understand the point of this at all. Might be a fun project for you to do, but nobody wants a bunch of communication set before them that you can’t interact with. It doesn’t help this grow at all.
But only the posts, while I want to have all of the conversation, comments included.
What if I told you that I started working on this precisely because some of the people who were active on /r/emacs wanted to leave reddit but would also like to support those coming with questions? With this tool we can see the content on Lemmy, respond on Lemmy and (WIP) end up notifying the original asker on reddit.
I’ll definitely check it out if you follow through with it. I just can’t envision wanting a link to Reddit at all anymore.
And in case you want to help, everything is open source and on Github.
And if you really want to help, consider becoming a sponsor.
Something a bit similar to what lemmit is already doing, but more powerful with your addition of comments: read-only, best-of archives of really old content from popular subs.
10-5 year old askreddit posts for instance would be interesting blasts from the past to read today. Isn’t there already a ‘best of Reddit’ convention on Reddit itself that resurfaces such content from time to time?
Wait, you're intending to use multiple bots, so users have to block multiple spammers?
You are fixated on the bots. Don't worry about them. The bot accounts are only needed to have a way to get people on reddit to migrate.
The real point here is that this tool is as spammy as the admin of mirror instances. It's the admin that sets:
What people are failing to understand: the last point is not automated. The idea is not to get the firehose from reddit and unleash it on Lemmy. The idea is mostly to bring some automation to the process that I've been doing on all the different lemmy communities already where I was (a) browsing reddit just to seed content here and (b) sending DMs to people on reddit to let them know about the lemmy alternative.
Let me repeat: you will not see a flood of posts from bots coming from alien.top or any "fediverser" instance.
I agree that technically the person using the bots is to blame, while I only ever see the bots, and never a person behind them. I don't see what that changes about their behaviour though. You clarified the bots are not acting autonomously, a human decides how much they spam. I still have a problem with too much spam.
How can you be so sure? We have precedent of bots making 800k posts per month. Apparently, bot admins exist who use these tools indiscriminately. Numbers go up, I guess.
What measures do you as the creator take to prevent abuse? How can you prevent abuse, once another person gets their hands on it?
It's free software, I am not going to pretend that I have any power to prevent abuse from motivated actors or if someone tries to weaponize it. But there are deterrents, mainly (a) the fact that accessing Reddit's API has a cost for those trying to do high-volume of requests and (b) all the bots are in the same instance which makes it very easy to be defederated.
Ok, so your previous assurances were completely unfounded. Maybe even worse, your reluctance to see how your tool could be misused gives little hope you would take steps to prevent that.
It's still an action thousands of people need to take just to undo the harm of one bot, or one instance. And some will not know how to, and leave Lemmy instead, which is exactly the opposite from your intent. Please run these bots in instances which are not federating their content to the fediverse. Make the newsletter opt-in. Don't force people to opt-out. Even more so since for each user who might enjoy that service, many more will suffer from it.
Also, since you just clarified it's free software and you have no power to prevent abuse, "all the bots are in the same instance" is nothing but a hope. From my point of view, it does not matter so much anyways. More spam bots / spam instances are added to the network, which is bad.
Since we already have a solid problem with spam bots, this does not seem to deter effectively. It's strange but apparently it's what people do with these bots.
No, it's an action that an instance admin can take quite easily.
No. That completely destroys the intent of having a tool that is meant to bootstrap communities.
You and I seem to have very different ideas of what is "spam". We have bots like @L4s@lemmy.world that take RSS feeds from tech sites and post them to relevant communities and they seem to be well received. The posts are interesting get upvoted, the ones that are not get downvoted. Do you think that these bots should be considered "spammers"?
Let's leave at this: if you ever see any flood of content coming from alien.top, then I'll have no qualms in revising the policies and making adjustments to the system. But for now your arguments are inching closer and closer to concern trolling.
I also don't want to argue just for the argument, and noted we have very different perspectives without getting much closer.
Yes, thank you! Although I wonder what that might help, since you stated it's free software and you cannot control how it's being used.