130
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
130 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
59243 readers
3375 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Mehta said Google put him "in a pickle" by insisting that Roszak's testimony be confidential so that the public wouldn't understand the full context of the "embarrassing" email.
Nylen said that she quickly "objected and asked that Bloomberg have an opportunity to have a lawyer present to argue for continued public access."
Judge Mehta said that he would make a final ruling on Wednesday morning, but "in the meantime," Nylen noted that "all the documents that have been released" by the DOJ were "pulled back" and "the Justice Department's page" was "no longer online," at least temporarily.
That website is currently accessible again, but Bloomberg reported that "emails, charts and internal presentations" are still unavailable to the public, and Mehta still hasn't made his ruling on whether the DOJ can resume sharing any new exhibits.
Civil rights groups tracking the trial have previously criticized Mehta for protecting Google's privacy over the public's interest.
The DOJ seems increasingly concerned that blocking public access to key facts in the trial establishing Google's alleged monopoly might hurt its case.
The original article contains 731 words, the summary contains 176 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Google is a corporation, not a person. It shouldn't have privacy rights like a person.
Not in America.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood
Corporate person only when convenient.