350
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

The use of depleted uranium munitions has been fiercely debated, with opponents like the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons saying there are dangerous health risks from ingesting or inhaling depleted uranium dust, including cancers and birth defects.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 year ago

Why though? Can't imagine that these rounds are going to change the course of the war, so why? Are they out of non-Uranium ones?

[-] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

They are harder and penetrate armour better. So yes they will provide an advantage.

The sooner Russian occupiers are no longer murdering Ukrainians and dropping mines over every square meter of land, the less harm comes to Ukrainians.

[-] MoreAmphibians@hexbear.net 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tungsten penetrators perform better than DU ones. They're just more expensive and Ukrainian lives aren't worth that much.

[-] antisoupbarrier@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Plenty enough to rip through the Russian armor! These are just old stockpiles of ammunition that weren't getting use anyways.

[-] forcequit@hexbear.net 55 points 1 year ago

love to refresh my arsenal via proxy war

[-] SpanishSpaceAgency@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago

Love to get rid of my toxic waste by simply poisoning a different populace

[-] rogrodre@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

I know it hard for the recently scratched liberals to understand this, but It's perfectly okay to decommission a weapon, you don't have to use it on people to get rid of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
350 points (91.9% liked)

World News

32089 readers
841 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS