this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

13389 readers
60 users here now

All things programming and coding related. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago (9 children)

18% reduction (max) for learning a different language than html? Hard pass.

Especially with css you can give most of those small web design studios (and most wordpress plugins) a run for their money.

I think it’s unnecessary to learn some obscure „alt-sub-language“ if the improvement is so little.

[–] spencer@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm personally a big fan of SCSS over both CSS and regular Sass. Keeps the same syntax so it's not hard to pick up, but fixes some of the CSS jank.

That said, I think they're rolling out a new CSS version that covers some of those tweaks? I recall hearing abt that

[–] Paradox@lemdro.id 3 points 1 year ago

CSS has been growing a lot of "super powers" lately, that used to require a pre-processor. Custom properties (variables), nesting, calc, and color-mix used to be things we'd reach for a preprocessor for, but can now be done 100% in pure CSS. And generally, the CSS based versions are better than their old preprocessor counterparts. calc can mix units, so you can easily do things like calc(100% - 1rem) to subtract a rem from 100% of the parent container. Can't do that in Sass. Custom properties can be set by Javascript, or by media queries, and follow CSS scoping rules. Thats how I handle light/dark mode on my site.

[–] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

That sounds cool! I didn’t know that. Thanks for elaborating.

load more comments (6 replies)