this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
1049 points (81.2% liked)

Memes

45625 readers
1068 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (8 children)
[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I don't actually think. I just know I'm right. Then whenever I'm in an argument I can just link the [word we're arguing about] wikipedia article. Since I'm right and wikipedia has objective information the argument is over every time and I win.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Did you have something useful to add to the conversation?

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The conversation was you linking a Wikipedia article, I was at least hoping you'd link like a book or something. Like we could have a discussion if you were trying to argue against authoritarianiam as defined by say Bakunin or some other anarchist thinker.

Then I could respond with On Authority which argues that authority is a natural consequence of any organization and calling something authoritarian just means you're saying that it's a system that is able to successfully reproduce itself.

You could also try to link "authoritarianism" to fascism, but again that is pointless because there's already a term for fascism, which is Fascism.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)