833
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] meldroc@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I still wonder if artificial sweeteners mess with metabolism, say by training people to ignore satiety signals, which would be why we saw that study a few days back saying artificial sweeteners are associated with weight gain.

[-] NotYourSocialWorker@feddit.nu 4 points 1 year ago

One theory is that the body doesn't know if the sweetness is sugar or sweetener. So it produces insulin to take care of it. When the level of insulin gets too high the body tries to compensate by eating more. If that "more" is more sweetener...

[-] antisoma@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

While I'm no expert, that doesn't sound correct to me. I'd expect highly specific binding dependent on the chemical structure of glucose would be required to elevate insulin. A quick search seems to support that. I'm sure there are lots of studies on this that you could find if interested.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
833 points (96.2% liked)

World News

32076 readers
947 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS