this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
230 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37738 readers
419 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At least, some of the recent controversies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a whole lot of words for what in the end is not piracy with no laws being broken. There's a difference between a moral argument and law breaking.

[–] lloram239@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lots of piracy is also not breaking the law. Copyright violations are illegal, but that involves making copies, which you don't do when you stream a movie from a pirate site. It's the site provider that is breaking the law, not the viewer at the other end.

In the end it doesn't matter if you call it freeloading, piracy or whatever. You can twist the definitions of those words any way you want. What matters is that the content provider isn't getting paid.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not what's being discussed. It's whether laws are being broken. That's why the discussion is about piracy not payment.

[–] lloram239@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Did you miss the part where "Lots of piracy is also not breaking the law."?