this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
229 points (100.0% liked)

196

16573 readers
1902 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)

Do we have ways of computing orders of infinity higher than ℵ₀?

Crap. Markdown isn't markdowning. Fixed with unicode.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (18 children)

Symbolically, sure, but then you're not dealing with infinities you're just representing them.

It's a meme it's playing fast and loose with things but the general gist is that mathematics, to this day, doesn't really care about Gödel/Church/Turing, incompleteness, the halting problem, whatever angle you want to look at it from. Formalists lost the war and they simply went on doing maths as if nothing had happened, as if a system could be simultaneously complete and consistent. There's people out there preaching to the unenlightened masses but it's an uphill battle.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (13 children)

We have sorta the same problem with imaginary numbers, and I remember some programmable calculators can process complex numbers using symbolic representation (which happens to work similarly to Cartesian coordinates, so that's convenient)

But from what I remember any infinity bigger than counting numbers (say the set of real numbers) cannot be differentiated from each other, so we don't have established rules.

To be fair, I last tinkered with infinities in the aughts and then as a hobbyist. The Grand Hilbert Hotel can accomodate more compound infinities and still retain perfect utilization since the last time I visited.

[–] dat_math@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

(which happens to work similarly to Cartesian coordinates, so that's convenient)

it's more than convenient, it's isomorphism!

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)